Contaminant Comparison Chart

For a complete list of contaminants that PUR filters reduce, please view our Performance Data Sheets here.

 

 

 

PUR & PUR PLUS FAUCET FILTERS
RF3375/RF9999

View Filters

PUR PLUS PITCHER FILTERS
PPF951K

View Filter

PUR BASIC PITCHER FILTERS
PPF900Z

View Filter

 

Vs. Brita*

Lead
Microplastics
Mercury
Chlorine Taste & Odor
DEET
TTHM

PUR’s Filtration Systems Are Certified By NSF And WQA For Their Contamination Reduction. WQA certifications as of 5/27/21 for Faucet filter models RF-3375 and RF-9999.

¹ Certified to reduce 10X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
² Certified to reduce 3X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
³ Certified to reduce 2X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
*Versus best-selling Brita® pitcher filter OB03. Brita® is a trademark of Brita LP.
**Like other leading brands, PUR does not filter microbes. As of 3/1/23 Brita® and ZeroWater® were not certified to filter microbes. Brita® is a trademark of Brita LP. ZeroWater® is a trademark of Zero Technologies, LLC..

 

PUR & PUR PLUS FAUCET FILTERS

 

 

 

PUR & PUR PLUS FAUCET FILTERS
RF3375/RF9999

View Filters

 

Vs. Brita*

Lead
Microplastics
Mercury
Chlorine Taste & Odor
DEET
TTHM

PUR’s Filtration Systems Are Certified By NSF And WQA For Their Contamination Reduction. WQA certifications as of 5/27/21 for Faucet filter models RF-3375 and RF-9999.

¹ Certified to reduce 10X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
² Certified to reduce 3X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
³ Certified to reduce 2X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
*Versus best-selling Brita® pitcher filter OB03. Brita® is a trademark of Brita LP.
**Like other leading brands, PUR does not filter microbes. As of 3/1/23 Brita® and ZeroWater® were not certified to filter microbes. Brita® is a trademark of Brita LP. ZeroWater® is a trademark of Zero Technologies, LLC..

 

PUR PLUS PITCHER FILTERS

 

 

PUR PLUS PITCHER FILTERS
PPF951K

View Filter

 

Vs. Brita*

Lead
Microplastics
Mercury
Chlorine Taste & Odor
DEET
TTHM

PUR’s Filtration Systems Are Certified By NSF And WQA For Their Contamination Reduction. WQA certifications as of 5/27/21 for Faucet filter models RF-3375 and RF-9999.

¹ Certified to reduce 10X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
² Certified to reduce 3X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
³ Certified to reduce 2X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
*Versus best-selling Brita® pitcher filter OB03. Brita® is a trademark of Brita LP.
**Like other leading brands, PUR does not filter microbes. As of 3/1/23 Brita® and ZeroWater® were not certified to filter microbes. Brita® is a trademark of Brita LP. ZeroWater® is a trademark of Zero Technologies, LLC..

 

PUR BASIC PITCHER FILTERS

 

 

 

PUR BASIC PITCHER FILTERS
PPF900Z

View Filter

 

Vs. Brita*

Lead
Microplastics
Mercury
Chlorine Taste & Odor
DEET
TTHM

PUR’s Filtration Systems Are Certified By NSF And WQA For Their Contamination Reduction. WQA certifications as of 5/27/21 for Faucet filter models RF-3375 and RF-9999.

¹ Certified to reduce 10X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
² Certified to reduce 3X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
³ Certified to reduce 2X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
*Versus best-selling Brita® pitcher filter OB03. Brita® is a trademark of Brita LP.
**Like other leading brands, PUR does not filter microbes. As of 3/1/23 Brita® and ZeroWater® were not certified to filter microbes. Brita® is a trademark of Brita LP. ZeroWater® is a trademark of Zero Technologies, LLC..

 

How to Choose the Best Circulating Pump for Your System?

Choosing the right Circulating Pump can determine whether a heating, cooling, or hydronic system runs quietly and efficiently. A pump that is too small may leave distant radiators cold. One that is oversized can waste electricity, create valve noise, and increase maintenance costs. The correct choice depends on flow rate, required head pressure, fluid temperature, pipe resistance, and system layout.

In practical installations, technicians often begin with the design flow rate and calculate the total dynamic head. This includes pipe length, bends, filters, valves, heat exchangers, and elevation changes. A pump curve should then be compared with the system curve, not viewed alone. For example, a compact home loop may need a small variable-speed model, while a commercial circuit with several branches requires stronger hydraulic control. Check the fluid type carefully. Water and water-glycol mixtures do not behave identically.

Energy efficiency also deserves close attention. An electronically commutated motor, automatic speed control, and multiple operating modes can reduce unnecessary power use. However, advanced features do not fix poor sizing. That assumption can be wrong. I have seen pumps selected by connection size alone, even when the operating point was unsuitable. The result was vibration, unstable temperatures, and premature wear.

Reliable selection should follow manufacturer data, recognized engineering guidance, and the actual conditions at the installation site. Confirm voltage, materials, temperature limits, seal compatibility, noise expectations, and service access before purchasing. A professional review is valuable when the system includes mixed fluids, unusual pressure requirements, or several control zones. Small details matter. The best Circulating Pump is not simply the most powerful model; it is the one that delivers stable performance with sensible energy use and dependable service life.

How to Choose the Best Circulating Pump for Your System?

Understand Your System’s Circulation Requirements

How to Choose the Best Circulating Pump for Your System?

Understand Your System’s Circulation Requirements

Choosing a circulating pump starts with accurate system measurements. Determine the required flow rate at the design temperature. Then calculate pressure loss through pipes, valves, filters, and heat exchangers. In a closed loop, pump head usually overcomes friction, not building height. This detail is often misunderstood.

Record fluid viscosity, density, temperature range, and operating hours. These factors affect impeller performance and motor loading. The U.S. Department of Energy states that pumping systems can represent 25–50% of electricity use in some industrial facilities. Its Improving Pumping System Performance sourcebook also highlights major savings through system optimization. The International Energy Agency reports that electric motor systems consume about half of global electricity. Efficient circulation deserves careful attention.

Select a pump near its best efficiency point, but check real operating conditions. Oversizing creates noise, throttling losses, and unstable control. Undersizing may leave distant circuits cold. Variable-speed control can match changing demand, although it is not automatically efficient. A neat calculation can still miss air pockets, blocked strainers, or inaccurate valve settings. Field verification matters.

Tips: Measure flow and differential pressure after installation. Compare readings with the design curve. Check the operating point during peak demand and low demand. Leave room for uncertainty, but avoid adding excessive safety margin. A small error in assumptions can become continuous energy waste. (Sources: U.S. Department of Energy, Improving Pumping System Performance; International Energy Agency, Energy Efficiency 2023)

Calculate the Required Flow Rate and Pump Head

How to Choose the Best Circulating Pump for Your System?

Calculate the Required Flow Rate and Pump Head

Start with the system’s heat load and design temperature difference. For water, use Q = 0.86 × P ÷ ΔT. Here, Q is flow in cubic meters per hour, P is heat load in kilowatts, and ΔT is temperature difference in degrees Celsius. For example, a 50 kW heating load with a 10°C difference requires about 4.3 m³/h. Keep every unit consistent. Small unit errors can produce large sizing problems.

Next, calculate the required pump head. Add pipe friction, valve resistance, filter losses, and heat exchanger losses. In a closed hydronic loop, elevation usually does not add permanent pump head because water returns to its starting level. Open systems are different. Measure the actual pipe lengths and count each fitting. Guessing here is risky. Add a modest allowance, often 10–15%, but avoid excessive padding.

The pump should operate near the system’s calculated duty point, where flow and head meet. A larger pump is not automatically safer. It may create noise, high velocity, and unnecessary energy use. Variable-speed control can help when demand changes. During commissioning, check pressure, temperature difference, and valve positions. Listen for vibration. A practical warning: the first estimate is rarely perfect. Recheck the calculation after installation, especially when field routing differs from the drawing.

How to Choose the Best Circulating Pump for Your System?

Calculate the required flow rate and pump head before selecting a circulating pump.

How to read the chart:

Required flow rate is estimated using Flow = 0.86 × Heat Load ÷ Design Temperature Difference, where flow is measured in m³/h, heat load in kW, and temperature difference in °C. Required pump head represents the calculated pressure loss through pipes, fittings, valves, heat exchangers, and terminal units. Select a pump that meets both requirements at the same operating point, with a reasonable allowance for system uncertainty.

Representative engineering design values: final pump selection should be verified using detailed pipe-sizing, friction-loss, control-valve, and equipment-resistance calculations.

Choose the Correct Pump Type and Configuration

Choosing a circulating pump starts with the circuit, not the catalogue. The correct pump type depends on flow, head, temperature, fluid quality, and operating hours. A wet-rotor pump suits many small hydronic systems because it is compact and quiet. A dry-rotor design may be better for larger systems, higher temperatures, or demanding maintenance conditions.

Do not oversize the pump.

Oversizing can create noise, unstable valves, and unnecessary electricity use. The IEA has estimated that motor-driven systems consume about 46% of global electricity, making pump efficiency a practical engineering concern. For many variable-load systems, a variable-speed pump with differential-pressure control can reduce output when valves close. The control sensor must sit where pressure changes represent the real demand, not merely where installation is convenient. The U.S. Department of Energy recommends evaluating the complete pumping system, including the system curve, control method, and operating profile.

Configuration matters as much as pump type. A single pump may serve a stable residential loop, while duty-standby pumps improve resilience in hospitals or continuous-process facilities. Parallel pumps can handle changing demand, but poor staging may cause short cycling. Check valves, isolation valves, strainers, and air removal devices also affect performance. The European Commission’s Ecodesign Regulation No. 641/2009 sets an energy-efficiency index limit of 0.23 for many standalone glandless circulators. However, efficiency data alone cannot replace field judgment. Real pipe losses, glycol concentration, and seasonal demand often differ from the design sheet.

Compare Energy Efficiency, Materials, and Control Features

Selecting a circulating pump starts with the real duty, not the largest available motor. The U.S. Department of Energy reports that pumping systems can consume nearly 20% of industrial electricity. Oversizing therefore creates a persistent, avoidable load. Measure flow, head, pipe resistance, and operating hours before comparing models.

Energy efficiency depends on control quality as much as motor efficiency. Variable-speed control can reduce speed during partial-load periods, while proportional-pressure control suits systems with thermostatic valves. The European Commission’s Ecodesign Regulation 641/2009 established an Energy Efficiency Index limit of 0.23 for many circulators. That figure helps, but it does not replace a system calculation. A highly rated pump can still waste energy when its head is excessive.

Material selection must follow water chemistry and temperature. Cast iron is practical for closed heating loops, where oxygen exposure stays low. Stainless steel or bronze is safer for potable-water applications and corrosive conditions. Check seals, glycol concentration, and maximum temperature carefully. Small details matter.

Digital controls add useful visibility. Differential-pressure sensors can reveal blocked filters, air, or improper balancing. However, more automation is not always better. Sensors need correct placement and commissioning. The calculation is rarely perfect. Field readings may challenge the design sheet. The IEA identifies motor-driven systems as a major global electricity demand, making careful pump selection an operational decision, not merely a purchasing choice.

Verify Compatibility, Installation Needs, and Maintenance Requirements

Choosing a circulating pump begins with compatibility, not maximum power. Check fluid temperature, viscosity, pH, and suspended particles. Confirm the pump materials can tolerate every operating condition. A stainless housing may suit clean water, but not every treated fluid. Match the flow rate and head to the system curve. Oversizing can create noise, erosion, and unnecessary energy use. The International Energy Agency reports that electric motor systems consume about half of global electricity. The U.S. Department of Energy also notes that pumping systems can represent a substantial share of industrial electricity use.

Tips: Measure real demand before buying. Record pipe diameter, control-valve position, and pressure at several points. A short measurement often prevents an expensive mistake. Do not trust a catalogue number alone. Ask for tested performance data and the pump’s operating range.

Installation details deserve equal attention. Leave enough clearance for service access. Install isolation valves where maintenance requires them. Support the pipework independently, so its weight does not stress the pump casing. Follow the manufacturer’s alignment and electrical instructions. The Hydraulic Institute emphasizes correct system assessment, commissioning, and operating control in its pump guidance. Yet field conditions are rarely perfect. Trapped air, poor balancing, and closed valves can undermine a well-selected unit.

Maintenance should include vibration checks, temperature records, seal inspection, and strainer cleaning. Compare readings with the commissioning baseline. A gradual pressure drop may indicate fouling or wear. Planned maintenance is cheaper than emergency replacement, though schedules must reflect actual duty cycles. Industry reports often promote efficiency, but reliability still depends on disciplined daily observations.