Contaminant Comparison Chart

For a complete list of contaminants that PUR filters reduce, please view our Performance Data Sheets here.

 

 

 

PUR & PUR PLUS FAUCET FILTERS
RF3375/RF9999

View Filters

PUR PLUS PITCHER FILTERS
PPF951K

View Filter

PUR BASIC PITCHER FILTERS
PPF900Z

View Filter

 

Vs. Brita*

Lead ✓ ✓
Microplastics ✓ ✓
Mercury ✓ ✓ ✓
Chlorine Taste & Odor ✓ ✓ ✓
DEET ✓
TTHM ✓

PUR’s Filtration Systems Are Certified By NSF And WQA For Their Contamination Reduction. WQA certifications as of 5/27/21 for Faucet filter models RF-3375 and RF-9999.

¹ Certified to reduce 10X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
² Certified to reduce 3X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
³ Certified to reduce 2X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
*Versus best-selling Brita® pitcher filter OB03. Brita® is a trademark of Brita LP.
**Like other leading brands, PUR does not filter microbes. As of 3/1/23 Brita® and ZeroWater® were not certified to filter microbes. Brita® is a trademark of Brita LP. ZeroWater® is a trademark of Zero Technologies, LLC..

 

PUR & PUR PLUS FAUCET FILTERS

 

 

 

PUR & PUR PLUS FAUCET FILTERS
RF3375/RF9999

View Filters

 

Vs. Brita*

Lead ✓
Microplastics ✓
Mercury ✓
Chlorine Taste & Odor ✓
DEET ✓
TTHM ✓

PUR’s Filtration Systems Are Certified By NSF And WQA For Their Contamination Reduction. WQA certifications as of 5/27/21 for Faucet filter models RF-3375 and RF-9999.

¹ Certified to reduce 10X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
² Certified to reduce 3X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
³ Certified to reduce 2X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
*Versus best-selling Brita® pitcher filter OB03. Brita® is a trademark of Brita LP.
**Like other leading brands, PUR does not filter microbes. As of 3/1/23 Brita® and ZeroWater® were not certified to filter microbes. Brita® is a trademark of Brita LP. ZeroWater® is a trademark of Zero Technologies, LLC..

 

PUR PLUS PITCHER FILTERS

 

 

PUR PLUS PITCHER FILTERS
PPF951K

View Filter

 

Vs. Brita*

Lead ✓
Microplastics ✓
Mercury ✓
Chlorine Taste & Odor ✓
DEET
TTHM

PUR’s Filtration Systems Are Certified By NSF And WQA For Their Contamination Reduction. WQA certifications as of 5/27/21 for Faucet filter models RF-3375 and RF-9999.

¹ Certified to reduce 10X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
² Certified to reduce 3X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
³ Certified to reduce 2X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
*Versus best-selling Brita® pitcher filter OB03. Brita® is a trademark of Brita LP.
**Like other leading brands, PUR does not filter microbes. As of 3/1/23 Brita® and ZeroWater® were not certified to filter microbes. Brita® is a trademark of Brita LP. ZeroWater® is a trademark of Zero Technologies, LLC..

 

PUR BASIC PITCHER FILTERS

 

 

 

PUR BASIC PITCHER FILTERS
PPF900Z

View Filter

 

Vs. Brita*

Lead
Microplastics
Mercury ✓
Chlorine Taste & Odor ✓
DEET
TTHM

PUR’s Filtration Systems Are Certified By NSF And WQA For Their Contamination Reduction. WQA certifications as of 5/27/21 for Faucet filter models RF-3375 and RF-9999.

¹ Certified to reduce 10X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
² Certified to reduce 3X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
³ Certified to reduce 2X more chemical and physical substances than Brita’s® leading pitcher filter.
*Versus best-selling Brita® pitcher filter OB03. Brita® is a trademark of Brita LP.
**Like other leading brands, PUR does not filter microbes. As of 3/1/23 Brita® and ZeroWater® were not certified to filter microbes. Brita® is a trademark of Brita LP. ZeroWater® is a trademark of Zero Technologies, LLC..

 

Top 10 Silicone Ink Suppliers for Global Buyers

Silicone Ink is gaining attention as brands seek durable graphics for textiles, footwear, sportswear, and molded products. Its stretch, soft hand, and resistance to repeated washing can make it useful where ordinary prints may crack or fade. Performance still depends on the substrate, curing conditions, and application method. Small process differences matter.

Grand View Research valued the global textile printing market at about USD 2.6 billion in 2022 and projected an 8.9% compound annual growth rate from 2023 to 2030. This is a broader market measure, not a forecast for silicone ink alone. That distinction matters. It helps explain demand, but it cannot tell buyers which supplier will deliver consistent results.

This guide to the Top 10 Silicone Ink Suppliers for Global Buyers focuses on practical checks: product range, technical support, color consistency, production capacity, and experience with different printing setups. Buyers should also request current technical data sheets and test samples on their own materials. A supplier’s claims may look convincing on paper. Real production can be less tidy. Weighing these details can help purchasing teams compare vendors with clearer expectations, while recognizing that the best fit depends on the product and process.

Top 10 Silicone Ink Suppliers for Global Buyers

Silicone Ink: Composition, Properties, and Common Applications

Silicone ink is a formulated coating, not a single chemical. Textile grades commonly combine silicone elastomer, pigments, crosslinking components, and additives that adjust flow or adhesion. Some systems require precise mixing and controlled curing. Poor curing can leave prints tacky or weaken their bond to fabric. Small details matter. On a production line, test a cured swatch for stretch recovery, wash durability, and hand feel before scaling up.

Silicone’s flexibility and soft feel make it useful for athletic garments, grip patterns on socks, and raised garment graphics. It can also provide strong color coverage. However, thicker deposits may feel stiff or raised, and cure settings vary by fabric and formulation. Grand View Research’s Textile Printing Market report estimated the global market at USD 2.6 billion in 2023, with an expected 8.9% compound annual growth rate from 2024 to 2030. This figure covers textile printing broadly, not silicone ink alone. That distinction matters when buyers compare supplier claims. Test adhesion and appearance on the actual fabric; a promising sample may behave differently after repeated washing.

Silicone Ink: Common Applications and Typical Performance Needs

Qualitative comparison of how strongly common applications typically rely on elasticity, abrasion resistance, and adhesion to silicone substrates. Scores are an illustrative 1–5 guide, not standardized test results or market data.

Silicone inks are valued for flexibility and durability. Actual performance depends on the ink formulation, substrate, pretreatment, and curing process; consult technical data and test on the intended material.

How to Evaluate Silicone Ink Suppliers for Global Sourcing

A silicone ink supplier should be evaluated by how reliably its materials perform, not by a polished sample alone. Ask for a technical data sheet, safety information, recommended curing conditions, and batch identification. Then test the ink on your actual fabric or coated surface. Record adhesion, stretch, hand feel, wash performance, and curing time. A small swatch can reveal problems that a catalogue cannot.

Global sourcing adds practical questions. Confirm typical lead times, minimum order quantities, packaging details, and how the supplier handles batch changes. Request samples from more than one production lot when consistency matters. Check that documents and product specifications suit your destination and internal quality requirements. Clear answers are useful. Vague promises are not. A strong first test still cannot guarantee every production run, so plan incoming checks.

Tips: Send the supplier your substrate, print method, target finish, and curing equipment details. Ask for written test conditions, then repeat them in-house. Keep a small retained sample from each accepted batch. If results differ, pause and investigate before scaling up. This takes extra time, and sometimes the cause is your process—not the ink. That distinction is easy to miss.

Profiles of Ten Leading Silicone Ink Suppliers

Silicone ink suppliers often specialize in different printing needs. One focuses on textile decoration, where stretch and wash resistance matter. Another develops inks for silicone-coated products and can advise on surface preparation. A third offers screen-printing formulations for bold, opaque graphics. A fourth supports pad printing on small, curved components. A fifth supplies color-matching services for repeat production. Ask each supplier how its ink behaves on your exact substrate.

A sixth supplier may stand out for fast-curing systems, useful when production lines run at speed. A seventh may offer softer finishes for garments that need to flex. An eighth can provide technical guidance on mixing ratios and curing temperatures. A ninth may serve buyers needing smaller trial quantities. A tenth could focus on consistent batches for larger orders. These profiles are starting points, not guarantees. A polished datasheet is not proof of performance.

Request a sample and test it on the actual material. Record ink coverage, curing conditions, adhesion, and feel after washing or flexing. Check whether the supplier provides current technical documents and responds clearly to process questions. Even careful trials can miss differences in production equipment. That part is easy to underestimate. Compare results across suppliers before approving a formula, and keep the trial settings on file for future batches.

Top 10 Silicone Ink Suppliers for Global Buyers — Profiles of Ten Leading Silicone Ink Suppliers Capability-based comparison of common supplier profiles, not a verified company ranking. Product properties and process requirements vary by formulation; confirm them with the supplier.
Profile Typical Product Focus Common Applications Useful Buying Criteria Evidence to Request
1. Stretch-Textile Screen-Printing Specialist Elastic silicone screen-printing inks formulated for flexible textile decoration. Stretch garments, performance apparel, sportswear, and other flexible fabrics. Stretch and recovery, hand feel, opacity, wash durability, and compatibility with the fabric and printing process. Technical data sheet, recommended curing process, and test results for adhesion and laundering on the intended fabric.
2. Silicone-Rubber Component Ink Specialist Inks designed for printing on silicone rubber and related molded components. Keypads, flexible buttons, molded parts, and other silicone-rubber components. Adhesion to the specific silicone grade, flexibility, abrasion resistance, and compatibility with any surface preparation. Substrate-specific adhesion and abrasion test data, plus written guidance on cleaning, pretreatment, and curing.
3. Silicone Transfer-Printing Specialist Silicone ink systems used with transfer media and heat-transfer processes. Decorative marks, logos, and specialty finishes on apparel and selected flexible substrates. Transfer release, placement accuracy, finished-film flexibility, process window, and compatibility with the receiving material. Process instructions and sample transfers tested on the buyer’s intended substrate and equipment.
4. High-Opacity and Color-Matching Specialist Pigmented silicone inks and color-matching support for defined print requirements. Colored graphics, contrast prints, and applications where consistent appearance is important. Color consistency, opacity, batch repeatability, substrate influence, and availability of standard color references or custom matching. Approved color drawdowns or samples, color tolerances, and batch-control documentation.
5. Raised-Effect and Tactile-Finish Specialist Higher-build or specialty-effect silicone ink systems for dimensional finishes. Raised graphics, tactile details, textured prints, and selected functional markings. Print height and definition, surface feel, edge quality, flexibility, and repeatability in production. Printed production samples and process recommendations covering screens, print passes, and curing.
6. Primer and Adhesion-System Specialist Silicone inks supplied with, or supported by, primers and surface-preparation guidance. Substrates or components where ink adhesion requires a validated preparation system. Primer compatibility, surface cleanliness requirements, application method, drying conditions, and end-use durability. A complete system recommendation and adhesion-test results using the actual substrate and production sequence.
7. Industrial-Marking Specialist Silicone-based marking inks selected for durable identification or functional graphics. Industrial components, flexible parts, and products requiring printed marks or symbols. Resistance needs defined by the application, including abrasion, handling, cleaning agents, or environmental exposure. Test results for the specific exposure conditions; avoid relying on general durability claims alone.
8. Custom-Formulation Specialist Formulation development or adjustment for a buyer’s substrate, equipment, color, or performance needs. Projects with non-standard print requirements or a need to fine-tune processing and finished properties. Development timeline, minimum order quantities, sample availability, change control, and technical support. Written project specifications, sample evaluation criteria, and confirmation of any formulation or production changes.
9. Broad-Portfolio Silicone Ink Supplier Multiple silicone ink options, potentially including different colors, effects, and application systems. Buyers sourcing several print types or seeking to consolidate compatible ink requirements. Range fit, technical support across products, stock availability, product consistency, and clear application guidance. Current product data sheets, sample kits, and confirmation that each proposed product suits the intended substrate and process.
10. Export and Technical-Documentation-Focused Supplier Silicone ink supply supported by export coordination and product documentation. International sourcing programs requiring repeat shipments and clear handling information. Lead times, packaging, shipping conditions, communication, document availability, and support for destination-market requirements. Safety data sheet, technical data sheet, shipment and packaging details, and any applicable compliance documents for the specific product and market.

Comparing Product Range, Quality Standards, and Global Reach

A useful comparison of silicone ink suppliers starts with product range, not catalog size. Check whether each supplier offers inks for the fabrics and processes you actually use, including cotton blends, coated textiles, and different screen meshes. Ask for technical data sheets, recommended curing temperatures, mixing guidance, and sample quantities. A broad range helps only when the options are clearly documented. That matters.

Quality standards need practical verification. Request batch traceability and current test reports, then compare their scope and dates rather than relying on a certificate logo alone. Run samples on your own substrate; small changes in fabric finish or curing conditions can affect adhesion, stretch, and wash performance. No checklist removes every risk. I would also record the trial settings, since a successful sample is difficult to repeat from memory.

Global reach is more than a map of shipping destinations. Compare typical lead times, export packaging, technical support across time zones, and how suppliers handle urgent replenishment. Ask whether the same formulation is available from different production locations, and confirm any regional stock claims in writing. Fast delivery can be useful, but inconsistent batches create rework. Some comparisons remain imperfect: published specifications rarely show how responsive support will be after an order arrives. A short technical call and a small trial order can reveal gaps before larger commitments.

Key Factors in Selecting a Supplier for Your Market

When comparing silicone ink suppliers, start with the fabric and printing process you actually use. Ink suited to polyester may behave differently on nylon or coated textiles. Ask for substrate guidance, mixing ratios, curing ranges, and test data. Then run a small production trial. Real press speeds and oven settings can reveal adhesion or surface issues that a desk sample misses.

Tips: Request a sample lot and technical data sheet. Record cure temperature and dwell time. Wash and stretch printed swatches after conditioning. Compare more than one batch. Keep notes; memory gets fuzzy.

Check whether the supplier can provide consistent batches, practical technical support, and lead times that fit your production schedule. Ask which documents are available for your destination market, and have qualified staff review them against your requirements. Compare minimum order quantities and total delivered costs, not just the price per kilogram. A low quote may hide costly delays. No checklist catches everything, so leave room for a trial—and for reconsidering your choice if results vary.